Dissertation
NEW!
“Congratulations! We are excited to inform you that your work is being accessed by other researchers and libraries around the world. As a result of their interest in your work you have earned a royalty payment from purchases of your dissertation or thesis through ProQuest in all formats, including downloads, print, and microfilm.”–ProQuest: Part of Clarivate, March 27, 2023.
[NOTE: Please find below the dissertation abstract. Check Scholar Google or ProQuest for more information.)
Exploring Surgeons’ Attitudes and
Behaviors Toward the Bloodless Policy and
Emergency Treatment of Jehovah’s Witnesses Relative to
Patient-Centered Care and Evidence-Based Medicine:
A Multiple-Case Study
© 2018 Firpo Carr
ABSTRACT
The
American Medical Association, as well as other reputable sources, charge that
blood transfusion is the most common and the most overutilized medical
treatment procedure performed in the U.S. Because of their refusal to accept
blood transfusion the 8.3-million-plus worldwide Christian group known as
Jehovah’s Witnesses (“JhW”) run the risk of not receiving adequate medical
attention in the case of a medical emergency wherein the surgeon would
otherwise order a blood transfusion. For decades JhW and their children have
died on the operating table as confused and frustrated surgeons have panicked
when forced to treat them. As patients, the JhW have garnered the attention of
the global medical community like no other religious or cultural group and have
influenced treatment protocol on an unprecedented scale. The surgeon becomes
vulnerable to Cognitive Dissonance when, in a medical emergency, his or her
attitude and behavior are negatively affected as an attempt is made to balance
the maxim to do no harm and the bloodless policy of JhW. The purpose of this
study is to explore surgeons’ attitudes and behaviors toward the bloodless
policy and emergency treatment of JhW relative to Patient-Centered Care (PCC)
and Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). This qualitative study employed a multi-case
approach which involved two surgeons. The results of the study demonstrate that
surgeons experience Cognitive Dissonance as a result of Belief Bias in
connection with the bloodless policy of JhW. It was also discovered that Forced
Compliance caused mental anguish and distress in surgeons who sought to assuage
through Cognitive Dissonance Theory (CDT). Surgeons seemed to be positively
affected by the introduction of an eight-pronged educational intervention based
on EBM and related themes. This educational intervention is recommended for
inclusion in medical school curriculums and continuing education courses which
would ultimately improve PCC. Future research could explore Cognitive
Dissonance in the JhW patient who believes that blood transfusion will save his
or her life, but declines one due to Belief Bias. A future study could also
investigate Forced Compliance in the patient who may feel compelled to accept
the bloodless policy to remain in good standing with the group.